Most Popular Sports
All Sports
Show All

Olympics Rio 2016: Lizzie Armitstead at fault for 'chaos' she's in says Mark Cavendish

ByReuters

Updated 09/08/2016 at 14:40 GMT

World champion Lizzie Armitstead is responsible for the chaos she is in following three missed drugs tests, fellow British cyclist Mark Cavendish said on Tuesday.

Lizzie Armitstead

Image credit: Reuters

Armitstead was allowed to compete at the Rio Olympics only after being cleared by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) following a provisional suspension by UK Anti-Doping (UKAD).
"Did she dope? No, and I don't believe she did. Was it an administrative error? Yes, it was, absolutely? Was it her fault? Yes, it was, absolutely," Cavendish, who is in Rio to take part in the omnium event on the track, told Sky Sports.
Cavendish, who has 30 Tour de France stage wins to his name, was speaking from experience, having once missed a test.
picture

Mark Cavendish in the men's preliminaries at the Rio 2016 Olympics

Image credit: Reuters

"I know from personal experience how difficult the whereabouts system can be," he said.
"But I have an alarm on my phone every night at 6pm and my wife has one on her phone and she makes a habit of when we talk every night she will ask me 'Have you done your whereabouts?'"
Armitstead, who finished fifth in the Olympic road race on Sunday, claimed that her phone was on silent when testers tried to locate her at a hotel.
picture

Fans including John Armistead (2L) father of Britain's cyclist Lizzie Armitstead wait for the start of the road race.

Image credit: AFP

"I had a missed test with the Giro d'Italia and I think the majority of sports people have a missed test because you are a bit blasé until you get your first missed test," Cavendish said.
"You are a bit blasé until you miss your first test, but missing three? I think Lizzie herself could have prevented the chaos that she's in."
Cavendish, however, hinted the rule that states an athlete can face a suspension of up to two years in the case they miss three tests within a 12-month rolling period, is too harsh.
"I don't think it is fair that you can get a bigger sanction for an administrative failure than for an actual doping offence. It's ridiculous," he said.
Join 3M+ users on app
Stay up to date with the latest news, results and live sports
Download
Related Topics
Share this article
Advertisement
Advertisement